What a start to 2022!
On the final day of 2021, the German consumer protection and litigation lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, as he was commenting on Michael Yeadon’s explanation of Craig Paardekooper’s findings regarding alleged contaminated mRNA vaccine batches, asserted that the evidence could ‘be enough to dismantle the entire industry’. Not long after New Year’s Day a first case of ‘flurona’ was reported in Israel. And there was this announcement made by two American telcos that they would be putting on hold the roll-out of their 5G networks amid concerns that this technology might affect aeroplanes. There was also this furore about a vaccine inventor’s (Dr Malone’s) appropriation of the concept of mass formation psychosis in a long interview this mRNA patent-holder gave to Joe Rogan, a famous American TV/radio presenter, comedian and sports commentator. Mid-month, an important hearing was held in the parliament of Luxembourg, which allowed some prominent critics of the current policies to voice their concerns. Three days later, there was an anti-Green pass, anti-compulsory vaccine rally in Milan (with the participation of Professor Luc Montagnier, a Nobel prize winner). On the 23rd there was a similar rally in Brussels (with a staged attempt at vilifying the demonstrators orchestrated through a covert and highly unethical collusion between the police, the media and antifa thugs, according to Janet Ossebaard) and a presentation by the aforementioned litigation lawyer Reiner Fuellmich about his team’s soon-to-be-launched international legal proceedings against the main perpetrators of the COVID scam-demic. A day later, a very important hearing, which lasted more than 5 hours, took place in a room of the US Congress. Presided by Senator Johnson (Wisconsin), this hearing was attended by some of the most influential medical dissidents with respect to the COVID protocols being followed in that country as well as by two anti-mandate activist lawyers. Finally, there was the caravan of unhappy lorry drivers (or truckers in North American English) that crossed Canada and ended blocking the capital Ottawa, thus expressing in a very audible and visible manner the frustrations of a significant portion of the country’s population with the highly tyrannical policies of Justin Trudeau and his government. So the month ended with a real gush of hope spreading across many parts of the world and which I can only sincerely wish that it will turn into a (peaceful) tornado of change for the better and for as many of us as possible.
Lausanne, the above was posted on the first day of the second month of the year two thousand and twenty-two.Boris Johnson at these Downing St parties with wine bottles because, you know, he said he couldn’t tell the difference between the party and work: ‘I thought it was a work event.’ Then they find pictures of him with … a birthday cake and on and on.
But here’s the thing folks: you know … yeah it, it’s disgusting hypocrisy, isn’t it? Is this new that we have politicians who are hypocrites? Is it new that we have politicians who break their own rules? The problem that I have with all of this that is happening in the UK though … is that should it be a crime for Boris Johnson to go to a party? Should it be a crime for Boris Johnson to have a birthday cake? Should it be a problem for Boris Johnson to have some wine bottles? Should that be a crime?
You see, the problem is that all of this complaining – and of course a lot of it is partisan carping: people who want to get rid of him. Hum and I’m not a Boris Johnson defender, you know that! I’m not defending Boris Johnson whatsoever. There was a crime committed here. The crime was to tell other people that they couldn’t have parties, that they couldn’t have birthday cakes, that they couldn’t have bottles of wine. That was the crime, but these people have bought into this totalitarian regime so much that they prefer equality and slavery – that’s what’s being pushed to the British people in these attacks against Boris Johnson. They’re saying ‘Well, he locked us down. He should be punished because we’re all supposed to be locked, we’re all supposed to be punished if we, if we have birthday parties and things like that, everybody should be punished – even the Prime Minister’. No, you should punish him, he did commit a crime: his crime was to put those rules on you. That’s the crime he should be investigated for. He should be investigated for the crime of putting the nation on lockdown, not for living his life. And yet that’s what they’re pushing. They want people to demand equality and slavery instead of freedom. And that’s what they’re doing right now. That’s what this is all about. That’s what the press is pushing. That’s what the government is pushing. Now, from his standpoint, if he’s got enough um…um… political clout with Scotland Yard or whoever these people are that are investigating him for the non crime – again, investigating the non crime of going to a party when they don’t investigate the crime of him imposing lockdowns. But the people who are investigating this, hem they may wind up giving him cover. You know, it could go either way. If they don’t do anything about this, this could be a way for him to say: ‘See, I was investigated. They didn’t find any crime, so I’m good to stay here’. Or his political opponents could find that there was a crime and he could be out. You see, we don’t know because all of this is like a Stalinesque-Nazi regime where, you know, we have lost all mooring to ethics, to morality, to law. And this is just a witch-hunt and who has the better political connections. That’s all this is about. If it was about anything else, he would be standing in the dock for locking the country down, for pushing out dangerous, untested vaccines. But the investigation into his partying continues.