In the following clip (almost 40 minutes long), which was uploaded on his website on 21st July, David Icke provides a scathing rejection of the climate change narrative based on little known historical facts (e.g. known previous warm periods in Europe; the Little Ice Age; weather modification technology – cloud seeding, HAARP) and connects the climate change agenda to the COVID-19 pandemic agenda, all of which he believes are part of a push towards global fascism – probably better known under the euphemisms used in the mainstream media of ‘build back better’ or of the ‘Great Reset’ – based on the famous Roman adage ‘Cui bono? Is fecit cui prodest.’
As usual, do not take my word or David Icke’s own words: do your own research, preferably using censorship-free search engines (or ones not as heavy on censorship) such as https://search.brave.com, https://swisscows.com, https://yandex.com, https://www.qwant.com, https://www.mojeek.com, https://peekier.com, https://gibiru.com, https://duckduckgo.com, https://metager.org or https://searx.bar (the last two being meta search engines).
[...]
[22m23s] Do you know that the greenhouse gas – that’s up into the 90 percent of greenhouse gases in totality – is water vapour and clouds? Oh, why aren’t Extinction Rebellion seeking a ban on condensation and water vapour? Instead, they’ve targeted carbon dioxide, which is a tiny, tiny percentage of greenhouse gases. And the great majority of that tiny percentage is naturally caused, not caused by human activity. So they’ve targeted carbon dioxide. Why? Because we are facing ultimately a non-human force with an anti-human agenda that involves not only mass control of humans through mass dependency, by the many on the few, but also seeks to destroy the population’s ability to survive by having enough food, by having enough water, by even having an atmosphere that is conducive to human activity. They’re changing all of those things. And it’s an anti-human agenda because ultimately it’s an anti-human force that’s behind it. This is why they’re targeting the food. This is why they’re targeting energy. This is why they’re targeting all the basics of life. This is why they’re seeking to change the human form through these fake vaccines that are synthetic, genetic manipulators of human biology. And this is why they’re targeting carbon dioxide without which there would be no life on Earth.
The lies are unbelievable, weather … like all lies are unbelievable – unless you bloody believe them and get caught by them, I guess – but about 800 years ago, maybe a thousand years ago, 800 years ago, there was the mediaeval warm period, when temperatures were on a par or higher than they are now. OK, so what part did carbon dioxide play in the mediaeval warm period? ‘Well, it was then turbo charged and carts, that’s what it was.’ Yeah, okay. But of course it’s obvious: there was no industrial activity, there was no human carbon dioxide production, even on the tiny level comparatively to greenhouse gases that we have. So what caused it then? And then after the mediaeval warm period, we went into something called the Little Ice Age when for centuries it was very, very, very cold and a lot more people died than in the mediaeval warm period when there were … in the north of England, in the medium warm period, they had …um they were growing grapes. Try doing that now with any success. And the other thing, before I leave the mediaeval warm period is that people say ‘what happens is you produce carbon dioxide and then uh it gets hotter’. No, no, no, bloody no. The opposite is the case. Look at the evidence, just … just check the bloody evidence; don’t just take it from me. There is a lag time between the temperatures rising and an increase in carbon dioxide. Not the other way round, that way round. Why? Because when the sea is cold, it absorbs carbon dioxide. When it warms up, it releases it. And there’s a lag period – some say it’s 800 years – but there is not a correspondence between increased carbon dioxide production and increased temperature; there’s a connexion between increased temperature and carbon dioxide production – the very opposite of what we’re being told, as bloody usual. So after that Mediaeval Warm, we had the Little Ice Age. And you can see depictions of it, you know, still in some Christmas cards where you’ve got people, um, skating on the River Thames in London because every year the River Thames froze over. They used to have ice fares on the River Thames, it was so cold. And then through the … the end of the Victorian era, the Little Ice Age started to disappear completely. Now, ‘this … this is the hottest day since records began’. OK, now, first of all: we have to um take it that your temperature readings are correct. And I mean: ‘You know those things you put up to … to check the temperature … Yeah? You don’t put them at airports near runways, do you? Where there’s lots of heat and where planes are going past whacking out, kind of, you know their engines very, very hot air. You don’t put them there, do you?’ ‘Oh, you bloody do. Oh, really. What’d you do that? Aah … it makes the temperature look higher than it is. All right, gotcha, alright? Yeah.’ And that’s how it works. Do you know, I’ve seen them … I’ve seen pictures around the world: you know, they have these kind of sensors, and they, you know, sense the temperature and they … ‘Whoo this is the’ … You want to see where they put some of them! Not only at bloody airports and military bases, with the planes taking off all the time, but I’ve seen them plonked next to like heat grills which are pouring their heat out of a building. And um the heat’s pouring out of the building straight onto the frigging sensor. ‘Oh, look the temperature going up.’ ‘No, no it’s coming out of your frigging grill, mate, look!’ ‘Oh yeah, well that’s what we wanted.’ Yeah, exactly … exactly: the whole thing’s bloody manipulated. But, anyway, it’s the hottest day since records began. OK, there’s the question: ‘When did records begin?’ ‘Well, they … they … they mostly begun where we were still coming out the Little Ice Age.’ ‘Thank you!’ So comparing the temperatures in the past to the temperature now is an insult to the intelligence, which is of course a speciality of the woke mentality and the … the cult behind it. And then there’s this to take into account: the fact that, for a very, very long time, it has been possible to manipulate the weather. ‘Oh they can’t.’ ‘Yes, they can.’ They’ve been doing it since way back in the 1940s, at least. And it’s just got more and more and more sophisticated.
You know, in 1952, the year I was born, there was a phenomenal rain storm, fantastic rain storm – something like 250 times the normal rainfall – in a place called Lynton and Lynmouth – that’s in North Devon. And it washed much of the town away – or the villages away – as … as a … a wall of water came down the river towards the sea. And it was like: ‘What happened in 1952? What happened there?’ Well, a long time later –and it’s extraordinary that I’m saying this –, the BBC did a radio documentary into the Lynton and Lynmouth disaster. And um they found that the RAF was flying above Lynton and Lynmouth, seeding the clouds with chemicals to make it bloody rain. And they overcooked the pot, didn’t they? And down it came and people died. And if you can’t manipulate the weather, why are there international treaties between countries saying that you cannot use the weather – or they agree to not use the weather – as a weapon of war? Why have I read American Pentagon military documents not just describing, but eulogising about their ability to use technology to change the weather and create extremes of weather? You’ve got the Chinese at the Beijing Olympic Games using weather technology so that the weather was good when they wanted it. The Russians do the same and openly talk about it. You’ve even got companies now that are charging upwards of £100,000 to guarantee the good weather for your bloody wet wedding by manipulating the weather in that area. Come on! You know, a few years ago now – people in Britain will remember it – we had a catastrophic summer of rain: it just rained and rained and rained throughout the summer. And um what the weather people said is that the Jet Stream that brings the weather from um West to East had suddenly changed course. And uh that reminded me of the guy who secured the patent for the uh HAARP technology in Alaska – and there are many um versions of that around the world now – which fires radio waves of great power at the ionosphere in the upper atmosphere, makes it vibrate and it comes back it with even greater power. And the man who secured the patents for that technology said that it can change the … the direction of the Jet Stream. So the idea that they can’t manipulate the weather is ridiculous. Now, if you have access to that technology and you want to frighten the shite out of people that weather catastrophe is here, so that you can impose the agenda you want as a result, are you going to use that technology? Or are you going to say ‘Oh, no, we can’t use that and manipulate the people’? Say those who manipulate the people by the minute. So what we’ve had is this gigantic network, which has built up, whereby all the institutions – like the Met Office in Britain – have been co-opted and infused with the climate change agenda. So weather … weather men and weather women don’t just tell you if it’s going to be hot or not, or whether it’s going to rain, they tell you if you’re going to die or not – ‘Oh, the weather all’ – because they’ve all been co-opted by this climate change nonsense. Extinction Rebellion, Just Oil and all these people, the insiders will know what they’re doing; the rest of them are just repeaters repeating a story put out by the very establishment they claim – ‘Oh, my God!’ – to oppose. And the media (‘Phew! What a scorcher!’) will, on tap, on call, use their access to people to ramp up the fear, to sell the lie. So um I um have been travelling through England amid this heat wave – we’ve been out filming all frickin day and I’ve been wearing a jacket um most of the time … and um I’m fine, everybody’s fine that was out in it all day, every day, right across it – because some of us don’t fall for manipulated fear and some of us have the ability to think for ourselves and ask the question ‘who benefits?’ from what is happening and what we’re being told to believe. Well, the answer to ‘who benefits?’ from fear of climate disaster answers itself.