On Monday
24th January 2022, a group of medical experts
and scientists advocating alternative treatments
for COVID-19 convened in a room of the US
Congress under the auspices of Senator Ron
Johnson.
Towards the end of the hearing, the Ohio-based attorney
Tom Renz revealed some rather
explosive information: namely, the surge in
serious adverse events recorded in
a medical database overseen by the
US military.
An increase confirmed by one of the doctors taking part in
the round table, the Idaho-based Dr Ryan Cole. Below is
the excerpt (taken from the 5-hour plus hearing) where
such information was disclosed – plus a transcript of what
was said.
Senator Ron Johnson
I got contacted by attorney Tom Renz, over the weekend, who represents some whistleblowers within the Department of Defence … uh and Tom you cannot … you don’t have much time at all, okay? Uh he showed me his data – or he showed me the data that is being extracted from … what is the name of this database?Senator Ron Johnson
Pardon?Tom Renz
DMED, it’s the defence medical database [Defence Medical Epidemiology Database].[Applauses]
Senator Ron Johnson
So … so again the Department … the Department of Defence … thank you … the Department of Defence, the Biden Administration is on notice: they must preserve these records and this must be investigated, okay?Senator Ron Johnson
So the increase in cancer is something I’ve been hearing about for months. And, quite honestly, I’ve told people that are reporting this to me: ‘I don’t think the public’s quite ready for that yet’, okay? But you’ve just raised this issue. Apparently Dr Cole, you’re aware of this. Can you talk a little bit about that? Because this … this is … this is frightening.Doctor Ryan Cole
Thank you, Senator, and this is a challenge in terms of aggregating data. I saw a signal early on of certain viral conditions – Dr Parks pointed out mechanisms – I noticed certain viruses increasing. Well, these same T-cells, immune cells, keep cancers in check. So I do about 40,000 biopsies a year – I’m a busy pathologist – and I thought ‘Gosh, I’m seeing more of this type of cancer and this type of cancer and this type of cancer’. And so I’ve tried to talk to other laboratories and aggregate a bigger dataset, which obviously these federal datasets are a very easy way to see that signal. Obviously, I’ve been cancelled, I’ve been ridiculed, I’ve been maligned etc for saying so, but I’ve been observing it. And I can’t deny observation, that’s how science happens. Initially through observation, then we confirm through hypothesis, experiment and data. So, yes, we’re seeing it. And now when I … we travel with these groups and summits, I have oncologists, I have radiation oncologists: ‘I am seeing an uptick in cancers, I’m seeing these odd, stable cancers take off like wildfires after the vaccines’. It is happening. We need federal funding – the NIH isn’t looking at this: getting a grant to look at anything related to the vaccines is next to impossible because they’re ‘perfect, safe and effective’. So, it’s happening. My data is anecdotal, my observational group is significant, but we need additional studies to happen. And thank you to Tom for digging into what’s actually happening.