The London-based documentary production company Oracle
Films has just released a
new work of theirs* on a C-19 related topic, called ‘Safe
and Effective: A Second Opinion’. The latest
production of Oracle Films
focuses on some of the vaccine-induced injuries seen in England and
the failings of the trials conducted by the vaccine manufacturers, the failings of the regulatory agencies and of
the English medical system in general. It also touches upon ‘the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and
the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and
open debate on the subject’.
Just so as to give a little foretaste of the contents of this documentary, here are transcripts of three short segments:
1:51 - 2:36, Dr Aseem Malhotra**, Cardiologist Consultant
Having been double jabbed and being one of the first to take the Pfizer vaccine, I have after several months [of] critically appraising the data, speaking to eminent scientists in Oxford, Stanford and Harvard, speaking to two investigative medical journalists and being contacted by two Pfizer whistle-blowers, reluctantly concluded that this vaccine is not completely safe and has unprecedented harms, which leads me to conclude that it needs to be suspended until all the raw data has been released for independent analysis.
9:17-9:44, Dr Clare Craig, Diagnostic Pathologist
I don’t think anybody can deny that there has been harm. You can argue about how much, but you can’t deny that there has been harm. It’s just a scandal of such epic proportions that I think people don’t know where to begin with it. It’s frightening to even approach it.
13:10-14:18
John Bowe
Safe and effective? Would millions have been so confident if they’d known how different these gene therapies were? The word ‘vaccine’ may have served as a reassurance, but by no traditional definition were these vaccines.
Dr Clare Craig, Diagnostic Pathologist
The definition that the authorities are using is not what people understand the word vaccine to mean. The public’s perception of a vaccine is we’re thinking about polio and about measles and the conventional vaccines, where you have a very inert part of the virus being used and it prevents the illness. These ... these ... what we’re using now is a different technology. It’s new. And it doesn’t prevent the illness.
Dr Aseem Malhotra**, Cardiologist Consultant
Although it’s not my traditional area of expertise, my understanding, looking at the data, of the mechanism of harm from the vaccine is that the spike protein, which we believed initially to just be localised to the arm, appears to be distributed throughout the body in every major organ system for several months, causing either a direct reaction through toxicity or an autoimmune reaction. And that is the most likely explanation behind the mechanism of harm from the mRNA products.
Just so as to give a little foretaste of the contents of this documentary, here are transcripts of three short segments:
1:51 - 2:36, Dr Aseem Malhotra**, Cardiologist Consultant
Having been double jabbed and being one of the first to take the Pfizer vaccine, I have after several months [of] critically appraising the data, speaking to eminent scientists in Oxford, Stanford and Harvard, speaking to two investigative medical journalists and being contacted by two Pfizer whistle-blowers, reluctantly concluded that this vaccine is not completely safe and has unprecedented harms, which leads me to conclude that it needs to be suspended until all the raw data has been released for independent analysis.
9:17-9:44, Dr Clare Craig, Diagnostic Pathologist
I don’t think anybody can deny that there has been harm. You can argue about how much, but you can’t deny that there has been harm. It’s just a scandal of such epic proportions that I think people don’t know where to begin with it. It’s frightening to even approach it.
13:10-14:18
John Bowe
Safe and effective? Would millions have been so confident if they’d known how different these gene therapies were? The word ‘vaccine’ may have served as a reassurance, but by no traditional definition were these vaccines.
Dr Clare Craig, Diagnostic Pathologist
The definition that the authorities are using is not what people understand the word vaccine to mean. The public’s perception of a vaccine is we’re thinking about polio and about measles and the conventional vaccines, where you have a very inert part of the virus being used and it prevents the illness. These ... these ... what we’re using now is a different technology. It’s new. And it doesn’t prevent the illness.
Dr Aseem Malhotra**, Cardiologist Consultant
Although it’s not my traditional area of expertise, my understanding, looking at the data, of the mechanism of harm from the vaccine is that the spike protein, which we believed initially to just be localised to the arm, appears to be distributed throughout the body in every major organ system for several months, causing either a direct reaction through toxicity or an autoimmune reaction. And that is the most likely explanation behind the mechanism of harm from the mRNA products.
[Click on the picture with the
right button of your mouse, then on ‘picture-in-picture’
in the menu and
finally place your cursor on the picture at the bottom of the
screen to display the ‘Play’
icon [i.e. the white arrow pointing towards the right] to start
the clip, which will thus play in ‘picture-in-picture’
mode.
If it does not, click on https://seed306.bitchute.com/2m4a3NgD19fe/2t5lPLsqgD99.mp4.
Sources:
55:24
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion (2022) | Oracle Films
Banned Youtube Videos
First published at 03:11 UTC on September 29th, 2022.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2t5lPLsqgD99
https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
https://web.archive.org/web/20220929094028/https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
* Other works of Oracle Films on C-19 related topics include (amongst many other titles):
https://web.archive.org/web/20210215211128/https://www.oraclefilms.com/
https://web.archive.org/web/20220928000432/https://www.oraclefilms.com/alettertoandrewhill
https://web.archive.org/web/20220818112812/https://www.oraclefilms.com/mattletissier
https://web.archive.org/web/20220818112814/https://www.oraclefilms.com/tesslawrie
https://web.archive.org/web/20220818112812/https://www.oraclefilms.com/robertfkennedyjr
For reasons that elude me, the company Oracle Films does not display past productions of theirs on their website or on their YT channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7ukysi7EFM0y2jQ_MUJJlw); therefore, the titles of past documentaries of theirs can only be found by looking at the archived versions of their website, at https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.oraclefilms.com/, and subsequently looking up the title on either bitchute.com or brandnewtube.com.
** Another post on this blog featuring Dr Aseem Malhotra:
https://paulzanotelli.ch/blog/coronavirus/dissent/doctors/aseem-malhotra/his-dad-died-of-a-cardiac-arrest-plus-this-cardiologist-s-take-on-the-possible-link-between-the-injections-and-increased-risk-of-a-heart-attack.html
Lausanne, the above was
published on the twenty-ninth day of the
ninth month of the year two thousand and
twenty-two.
