Angeli tui sancti habitent in eis et me in pace atque bona valetudine custodiant. Amen.
Warning: together with Alex Jones, Jeff Rense is probably not only one of the oldest providers of alternative or so-called conspiratorial views on reality but also one of the most vilified – as typing ‘Jeff Rense’ in the query box of any search engine is bound to yield a good deal of ad hominem attacks among the first ten results. However, unless I am mistaken, no lawsuits have been instituted against Jeff Rense, unlike against, say, Alex Jones. This is the description of Jeff Rense’s work which shows up on DuckDuckGo for ‘Jeff Rense’: ‘For more than 25 years, Jeff Rense and Alt News have been an invaluable and indefatigable one-stop source for thought-provoking and vital information in the war against corruption and deception. Jeff’s work is the Flagship of Truth and the standard by which all others must be measured for honesty, consistency and insight.’
My objective here is not to pass judgment on Jeff Rense or on his operation – a platform upon which I must however admit that views a little outlandish to my own Weltanschauung seem to be regularly published. Rather, I wish to use excerpts of a broadcast of his which was aired on 28th October 2021 so as to be able to introduce the rather uncanny set of demographic projections for 2025 that were carried by the website Deagel.com up until roughly a year and half ago, along with some other points that were mentioned during that very same broadcast.
First, a screenshot I took of the Deagel.com website on 12th October 2019:
As for the radio broadcast, entitled ‘Jeff & James Karolak - the Deagel Projections: the Plan and the Outlook’, you can listen to it by click on the arrow just below:
[Jeff Rense – intro]
OK, let’s get going. It’s hard to imagine very many people, who are interested in the genocide of the planet, not knowing about the deagel.com website, which has been taken down, and the projections which were first posted, I believe, in 2013. I didn’t see them until 2017. And in those projections, they talked about gross domestic product, military capabilities, but mostly, most importantly, world country populations: where they are at the time you read the site back in those days, 2017, 2018, 2020, and where they were projected to be in 2025. For example, the UK with about 77 million now, in the Deagel projections, was headed towards a population, but I think it was 14 million remaining, in just three years from now. That was a shocker. There are many others: the US, supposedly 325 million reduced to just 99 million by 2025. And when you looked at the rest of the countries around the world, you began to see a pattern: first world, western European, North American, Canada Australia, New Zealand countries all lost big. For China, Russia, India and other countries – South America, Africa even – not much difference; very little difference in fact. So you kind of figured well, what, what the hell is going on here: is there a nuclear war going to be fought in terms of Deagel’s projections on the white, western Christian world, Western Europe, America, etc.? Well, now we know – and again I saw this first in 2017, I had no idea that the planned-demic was coming – now we know how those numbers could be reached: with the kill shot! And a lot of people in this country have been vaxxed. We don’t know how many, we think the figures are being fudged by the government to try to make Americans less likely to resist and join the majority. We don’t know: the best guess is probably 60% have taken a shot. I don’t think it’s two-thirds. But we’ll have to see what happens because the deagel.com site was taken down. We understood, um, who Deagel was. He did, in fact, put this together. He did, in fact, die within the past year. And I think his it’s hard to know, but he died, and I believe, in his mid-to-late 70s. The problem has been: How do we ascertain the validity of this rather shocking forecast when you take into account that Mr Deagel was very well appointed, I think in the Clinton administration he was Under Secretary of the Air Force, for example? This guy is not a flake. What did he know? Did he know anything? It seems like he may well have, and he’s not the only one. There are others who have talked about this current scenario before.
14m03s
[James Karolak]
Right, I mean nobody could project this being performed with the shots, you know. No, we’re not that evil. You have got to be evil to think that through, right? You know; back to that deagel.com, you know, he had probably a crew of 10. Right now: they already had the playbook. You know, I, I figured this whole thing still around um it’s been planned for a 100 years. And the last 20 and 30, that’s when they, you know, they wrote that playbook for how they’re going to pull this…
[Jeff Rense]
This is a, this is a, this is an outgrowth; seriously, if you trace back, like James is saying, the last 100 years, look at the big landmarks like World Wars One and Two, etc., you can follow this; you can track it. It’s a logical progression in – if you’re on the dark side – not for us, but I can see what you’re saying very clearly; I understand.
15m40s
[Jeff Rense]
What do you think the reason for deagel.com was? Is it under the old rubric they have to tell us in advance?
[James Karolak]
Yep, absolutely, 100% and I have a lot of evidence on that one. But, yeah, that was the reasoning behind it. And, you know, it’s their code of ethics – can you believe they even have ethics, these power leads? But um they have got to tell us what they do – you know what they’re going to do.
19m57s
[James Karolak]
In 2018, BlackRock owned two per cent of the single family homes in America. Right now they’re at 21 per cent. And you would ask: ‘Where are those homes?’ Just find out where Agenda 21 cities are and that’s where those homes are.
47m50s
[James Karolak]
[…]I use Ford Motor Company because I used to live a mile from Ford Motor Company in Dearborn Michigan. You know, they do forecasts. They’ll say, you know, next year we’re going to sell this many vehicles and our profits are going to be this – because they have all this data. They have all this data to make these forecasts. The same with um, with um deagel.com, they had the playbook; they have the data, so they can make these predictions, right? And by the way, I unravel another psyop, and that’s the, the chip shortage – that’s all bogus; I figured it out. The reason why it’s bogus is that, back to the forecasts, see, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, they all have a seat at the table, right? And they can’t, you know, tell the normies anything because they’ll lose that seat. So they know there’s a depopulation coming. And they know how many cars they’re going to sell in 2024, 25 and 26, right? So how do you go from, let’s say, yeah, you know, they’re selling in the city – they sold 3 million this year. They actually won’t be 3,000,000, actually less than that. But listen, they did 3,000,000 last year and they have to go down to a million. How do you do that? You tell the normies that, ‘Hey, by the way, we’re in genocide, so we have got to, we have got to cut back’. Now, you make up this bogus story [ME: ships not being able to offload containers in California causing a chip shortage]. So now they can cut back, you know, their production.
[Jeff Rense]
I’ve tried to make that point a couple of times about the amount of inventory. I …you go and try and buy farm equipment, for example. They’ll take your money, happily, and say, ‘Well, we, we can’t guarantee delivery soon, but we do guarantee within 18 months’. 18 months, so they know: they’re cutting back inventory because there aren’t going to be enough consumers, OK? You’ve got it.
CONCLUSION
[Jeff Rense]
This is, this is all exactly as we’ve laid it out and I say that with full responsibility for what I’m saying. It is what it is. It’s not what we want it to be. This is the new normal. And it’s not pretty. You still have a little time to prepare. Do it.
https://rense.com/general96/deagel-projection-analysis.php
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/scientists-mystified-wary-africa-avoids-covid-disaster-81271647
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405580820301072
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-020-01673-z
