Summary: evidence that both Stanley Johnson and his son Boris (BoJo) are depopulationists; their hypocrisy (they fathered 6 and 8 children, respectively) and non-compliance with the lockdown restrictions; BoJo being on very friendly terms with Bill Gates on Twitter; BoJo as a pusher for Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines; overpopulation is a myth.


Meet Stanley and Boris Johnson, two depopulationists.



I am no fan of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson (which is BoJo’s real name https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15496495/boris-johnsons-full-name/) primarily because as this patronym-hiding demonstrates the man is certainly no stranger to obfuscation and to lying – some might even call him an inveterate liar. More than that he is a consummate Russophobe (something which has to do with his forefathers, who fled Russia a century or so ago), whose reckless foreign policy towards the Russian Federation and meddling in the conflict in Ukraine has put not only his country (which he does not seem to care much about, BoJo having been a real super Pfizer pusher), but the whole of Europe in the doldrums. For the sake of brevity, I shall leave aside his own display of ‘toxic masculinity’ (an accusation he recently levelled against Mr Putin) and keep hush about his numerous extramarital affairs.

So, as the president of the Russian Federation had warned on 17th June when he had predicted a ‘change of elites in the West’, BoJo should probably be the first western leader to go, having announced last Friday his resignation, which I am happy to ascribe – at least in part – to BoJo’s personal responsibility for the debacle in Ukraine and the resulting economic slump in his country.

In the lines below, however, I wish to point out some little-known evidence regarding the contributions made both by Boris Johnson and his father, Stanley Johnson, to what I am afraid I need to call the ‘criminal and genocidal depopulationist ideology’ which has gained sway over most of the elites of the world – but more particularly so over those which rule the USA, Canada, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, etc.

Based on the information provided on his own website (http://stanleyjohnson.org/biog), Stanley Johnson, BoJo’s father, seems to have spent most of his professional life working as an apparatchik for various internationalist bureaucracies, including the European Commission, the World Bank and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (Planned Parenthood, which was founded by Margaret Sanger [George Grant, Killer angel: a biography of Planned Parenthood’s founder Margaret Sanger], operates abortion clinics in the USA). Stanley Johnsons detractors claim that early on in his apparatchik career he did a stint at the Rockefeller Foundation in New York (where his son Boris was born) during which he carried out research for his first books – which were about overpopulation: Life without birth (Boston, 1970), The green revolution (London, 1972), The population problem (New York, 1973), World population and the United Nations: Challenge and response (Oxford, 1987), World population, turning the tide: Three decades of progress (The Hague, 1994), The politics of population: Cairo 1994 (London, 1995).
 
As an aside, I believe that overpopulation is a myth (or rather an obsession among certain elite circles since at least the French Revolution – Gracchus Babeuf, Du système de dépopulation, Paris, 1794), in line with the arguments presented on the website Overpopulation is a myth, and that the associated ideology of eugenics (selective breeding) goes many centuries further back in time, to at least Plato, Aristotle and Sparta (a city-state which, as we all know, put it into practice).

To come back to Stanley Johnson, in 1982 Heinemann published a novel penned by him entitled The Marburg virus. The novel was given a second lease of life in May of 2020 (when the country was in lockdown – recall also ‘Stanley Johnson defends lockdown Greece trip’) when Stanley Johnson announced that he had signed a deal with Black Spring Press for a reprint of the novel without Marburg in the title. Here is an excerpt from the book’s blurb published on Mr Johnson’s website: ‘[The novel] reveals uncanny zoonotic parallels with the current corona virus: the outbreak of a mysterious and deadly disease, the origins of which are traced to a medical student infected by a green monkey. It features an epidemiologist as its hero and a desperate search for a vaccine.

For a picture of Stanley Johnson proudly presenting the reprint of his novel about a virus originating from monkeys (originally published in 1982), click here.

More disturbing are some of the statements Stanley Johnson dared to make in front of a camera. Once such instance was during an interview he gave in 2012 to John Vidal, a journalist working for The Guardian, which is an important leftist news outlet in the English-speaking world, and then to some stupid English talk show in 2019.  

[Click on the picture with the right button of your mouse, then on picture-in-picture’ in the menu and finally place your cursor on the picture at the bottom of the screen to display the Play’ icon [i.e. the white arrow pointing towards the right] to start the clip, which will thus play in ‘picture-in-picture mode. If it does not, click here.



Source:   https://www.bitchute.com/video/vL3U3cD7OFDJ


TRANSCRIPTS

FIRST EXCERPT

Stanley Johnson
[… I would certainly say] the no-growth people but I’d add as a corollary to that, you have to get population under control as well because if you look at it in economic terms, how can you sustain increases in per capita income at a time when you have rising population without rising economic growth? Whereas if you have a declining population – which is what I would aim for – then of course even a stable economic growth situation will give you increases in per capita income. So that’s where I stand on that.

John Vidal
Do you … do you have a sense of what the carrying capacity of Britain is or of the uh uh of the world as a whole?

Stanley Johnson
Well, Britain, I’d put it at 10 or 15 million.

[John Vidal laughs – notice the Satanic expression on his face.]

Stanley Johnson
Um I think that’d be absolutely fine. I mean that would do us really splendidly at a limit 20-25. I think it’s complete nonsense that we are now confronted with an island – would you believe it – of 70 million people. I wrote a paper – I think it’s the only paper the Conservative party has ever published and it was published as an Old Queen Street paper in … in June 1972 oddly enough: ‘Britain needs a population policy’. [Should you be interested, dear reader, you can peruse an article of his published online in 2015 rehashing the same tropes here: https://conservativehome.com/2015/09/09/stanley-johnson-why-britain-needs-a-population-policy/] And um

John Vidal
And you … you could still argue that today? I mean, right now?

Stanley Johnson
I certainly could. I certainly could. But what has happened, of course, is that we have all been, as it were, shunted aside ... off … shunted off course by what you might call the rise of political correctness. Because you can’t talk about this now without being said you’re an anti-feminist because you’re telling women what to do with their bodies, or you’re racist because you’re saying it’s the browns and the blacks and the yellow races who mustn’t have ... um ... or you’re left winger because you’re religious and trying to get it, you know, the capitalist society.

[John Vidal issues an um either in assent or out of embarrassment.]

Stanley Johnson
So it’s a very, very difficult one now and I would say that at the very least the governments of the world have to start talking, the government of this country has to talk start talking seriously about immigration. Because if you look at the rise in Britain’s population now, you will see that, as it were, there is a really serious differential in the fertility of the immigrant population to the fertility of what you might call the indigenous population. So anyway … but this is … this is … this is very political stuff, not one for Guardian readers.

Source:  22m and 8 sec into
The Guardian
12 June 2012
Stanley Johnson, author and environmentalist talks to John Vidal about his fifty years as an environmental campaigner
https://youtu.be/XpMTz1pICGE
 

SECOND EXCERPT
[The audience can be heard laughing – although it sounds pre-recorded because the laughing ends abruptly.]

[The show’s moderator – whose name I do not know – reads out a question. Notice the Russophobia implied in the question – the British so-called news outlets have been spewing anti-Russian propaganda for years now; in fact, ever since they realised that Russia’s new leadership would no longer allow the country to be looted by international corporations.]
A gas explosion tears through Russian bio-weapons lab containing smallpox, Ebola and HIV virus sparking ‘major emergency’

Stanley Johnson
That is absolutely wonderful because, as an environmentalist, I say to myself, the best possible news would be some mega emergency which got rid of huge chunks of the human race.

[Huge laughter erupts and some hand clapping can even be heard. In disgust, Tez Ilyas stands up and walks a few metres away from Stanley Johnson.]

[The show’s moderator responds but most of her words are drowned out by the noise coming from the audience.]
You stop it.
[In what I find to be an offensive gesture, the show’s moderator calls Tez Ilyas back using her hand in a waving-back movement.]   

Source: Tez Ilyas
Kinda explains Boris Johnson’s #COVID-19 strategy
4:33 pm · 14 Mar 2020
https://twitter.com/tezilyas/status/1238850688349655042?s=20
 

Now could Stanley Johnson’s obsession with what he believes is runaway human demographic expansion have influenced the thinking of his son Boris Johnson? To answer this question, please let me quote from an article BoJo wrote in 2007 (initially published in The Telegraph, but reproduced on BoJo’s personal website):

It is a tragic measure of how far the world has changed – and the infinite capacity of modern man for taking offence – that there are no two subjects that can get you more swiftly into political trouble than motherhood and apple pie.
[…]
As for motherhood – the fertility of the human race – we are getting to the point where you simply can’t discuss it, and we are thereby refusing to say anything sensible about the biggest single challenge facing the Earth; and no, whatever it may now be conventional to say, that single biggest challenge is not global warming. That is a secondary challenge. The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself.
[...]
How the hell can we witter on about tackling global warming, and reducing consumption, when we are continuing to add so relentlessly to the number of consumers? The answer is politics, and political cowardice.
There was a time, in the 1960s and 1970s, when people such as my father, Stanley, were becoming interested in demography, and the UN would hold giant conferences on the subject, and it was perfectly respectable to talk about saving the planet by reducing the growth in the number of human beings.
But over the years, the argument changed, and certain words became taboo, and certain concepts became forbidden, and we have reached the stage where the very discussion of overall human fertility – global motherhood – has become more or less banned.
We seem to have given up on population control, and all sorts of explanations are offered for the surrender. Some say Indira Gandhi gave it all a bad name, by her demented plan to sterilise Indian men with the lure of a transistor radio.
Some attribute our complacency to the Green Revolution, which seemed to prove Malthus wrong. It became the received wisdom that the world’s population could rise to umpteen billions, as mankind learnt to make several ears of corn grow where one had grown before.
All the evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and world poverty, by promoting literacy and female emancipation and access to birth control. Isn’t it time politicians stopped being so timid, and started talking about the real number one issue?

Source:
https://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/10/25/global-population-control/
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/10/25/global-population-control/
 
Given that both Stanley and Boris Johnson’s have lectured the world about their belief that the world is overpopulated, an obvious question begs to be asked, which is: how do both fare on that count, that is to say, what is the number of offspring each has fathered?

For Stanley Johnson, the answer is easy as the biographical outline posted on his website
http://stanleyjohnson.org/biog/ ends as follows: Stanley has four children by his first marriage to the painter Charlotte Johnson-Wahl: Boris, Rachel, Leo and Joseph. He also has two children, Julia and Maximilian, by his second marriage to Jennifer.

As for BoJo, he and his current wife Carrie had the pleasure of giving birth to a second child not long before Christmas of last year. However, there are rumours that, in addition to the known abortion, he might have fathered an eighth child: ‘[...] However, his exact number of children remains in doubt as a possible eighth child was alluded to in court documents.’ [Source: ‘Boris Johnson: How many children does the Prime Minister have?’, https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/boris-johnson-how-many-children-carrie-symonds-b970997.html

So just as it was the case for both as regards compliance with some of the regulations that had been put in place by BoJo and his government during England’s lockdowns (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8793391/Moment-Boris-Johnsons-father-Stanley-pictured-without-face-mask-local-newsagent.html;
  https://web.archive.org/web/20220711112955/https://swisscows.com/web?query=Stanley+Johnson+broke+lockdown+Greece), father and son obviously do not follow what they preach when it comes to their contribution to what they describe as overpopulation of our planet. I shall let you decide which noun is the most suited to such people: hypocrites, liars, con-men, etc. 

But the really important question with respect to BoJo, who when he was a journalist (he was London’s mayor from 2008 to 2016) blamed politicians for not having the guts to do anything about his claim that the world is overpopulated, is whether he has taken any action to reduce the population of Britain to the number his father estimates is the island’s ideal ‘carrying capacity since he was placed in his current position of Britain’s Prime Minister as a result of Theresa May’s resignation.

Dear reader, I shall let you guess where I stand on this issue through perusal of the following headlines:

Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
The Sunday Times
24 May 2009
https://web.archive.org/web/20101118002933/http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6350303.ece

‘No peasants, please’: BoJo’s love-in with Bill Gates on Twitter shows just how broken UK democracy really is
30 Sep. 2020 09:21
Neil Clark
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/502111-bill-gates-johnson-twitter/

BoJo hosts Bill Gates & pharma bigwigs to plot Covid-19 vaccine deployment as UK military preps for ‘biggest effort since WWII’
12 Nov. 2020 05:47
Helen Buyniski
https://www.rt.com/uk/506443-boris-gates-pharma-vaccines-military/
 
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/opinion/why-is-boris-johnson-destroying-britain/

https://defending-gibraltar.net/t/stanley-johnson-boris-s-dad-wrote-a-novel-can-you-guess-what-it-s-about/1337
 
https://www.ukcolumn.org/community/forums/topic/boris-johnson-population-control/
 
https://swisscows.com/web?query=the+daily+expose+Midazolam


Lausanne, the lines above were posted on the eleventh day of the seventh month of the year two thousand and twenty-two.