I am no
fan of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson (which is BoJo’s real name https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15496495/boris-johnsons-full-name/)
primarily because as this patronym-hiding demonstrates the man is
certainly no stranger to obfuscation and to lying
– some might even call him an inveterate
liar.
More than that he is a consummate Russophobe
(something which has to do with his forefathers, who fled Russia a
century or so ago), whose reckless foreign policy towards the Russian
Federation and meddling in the conflict in Ukraine has put not only
his country (which he does not seem to care much about, BoJo having
been a real super Pfizer pusher),
but the whole of Europe in the doldrums. For the sake of brevity, I
shall leave aside his own display of ‘toxic masculinity’ (an accusation he recently levelled against Mr Putin) and keep hush about his numerous
extramarital affairs.
So, as
the president of the Russian Federation had warned on 17th
June when he had predicted a ‘change of
elites in the West’, BoJo should probably be the first
western leader to go, having announced last Friday his resignation,
which I am happy to ascribe – at least in part – to BoJo’s personal
responsibility for the debacle in Ukraine and the resulting economic
slump in his country.
In the
lines below, however, I wish to point out some little-known evidence
regarding the contributions made both by
Boris Johnson and his father, Stanley Johnson, to
what I am afraid I need to call the ‘criminal
and genocidal depopulationist ideology’ which has gained sway over most of the elites of the
world – but more particularly so over those which rule the
USA, Canada, the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Austria, Switzerland, the
Netherlands, Spain, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
Based on
the information provided on his own website (http://stanleyjohnson.org/biog), Stanley
Johnson, BoJo’s father, seems to have spent most of his professional
life working as an apparatchik for various internationalist
bureaucracies, including the European Commission, the World Bank and
the International
Planned
Parenthood Federation (Planned Parenthood, which was
founded by Margaret Sanger [George Grant, Killer angel:
a biography of Planned Parenthood’s founder Margaret Sanger], operates abortion
clinics in the USA). Stanley
Johnson’s
detractors claim that early on in his apparatchik career he did a
stint at the Rockefeller Foundation in New
York (where his son Boris was born) during which he carried out
research for his first books
– which were about overpopulation: Life without
birth (Boston, 1970), The
green revolution (London, 1972), The population
problem (New York, 1973), World
population and the United Nations: Challenge and response
(Oxford, 1987), World
population, turning the tide: Three decades of progress (The Hague, 1994), The
politics of population: Cairo 1994
(London, 1995).
As an
aside, I believe that overpopulation is a myth (or rather an obsession among certain elite
circles since at least the French Revolution – Gracchus
Babeuf, Du système de
dépopulation, Paris, 1794), in line with the arguments
presented on the website Overpopulation
is a myth, and that the associated
ideology of eugenics
(selective breeding) goes many centuries further back in time, to at
least Plato, Aristotle
and Sparta (a city-state which, as
we all know, put it into practice).
To come
back to Stanley Johnson, in 1982 Heinemann published a novel penned by
him entitled The Marburg virus. The novel was given a second lease of life in May
of 2020 (when the country was in lockdown – recall also ‘Stanley
Johnson defends lockdown Greece trip’) when Stanley
Johnson announced that he had signed a deal with Black Spring Press
for a reprint of the novel without
Marburg in the title. Here is an excerpt from the book’s
blurb published on Mr Johnson’s website: ‘[The novel] reveals
uncanny zoonotic parallels with the current corona virus: the
outbreak of a mysterious and deadly disease, the origins of which
are traced to a medical student infected by a green monkey. It
features an epidemiologist as its hero and a desperate search for a
vaccine.’
For a picture of Stanley Johnson proudly
presenting the reprint of his novel about
a virus originating from monkeys (originally
published in 1982), click here.
More
disturbing are some of the statements
Stanley Johnson dared to make in front of a
camera. Once such instance was during an interview
he gave in 2012 to John Vidal, a journalist working for The Guardian, which
is an important leftist news outlet in the English-speaking
world, and then to some stupid English talk show in 2019.
[Click
on the picture with the right button of your mouse, then
on ‘picture-in-picture’ in the
menu and finally place
your cursor on the picture at the bottom of the screen to
display the ‘Play’ icon [i.e. the white arrow
pointing towards the right] to start the clip, which will
thus play in ‘picture-in-picture’ mode.
If it does not, click here.
TRANSCRIPTS
FIRST
EXCERPT
Stanley
Johnson
[… I would certainly say] the no-growth people but I’d add
as a corollary to that, you
have to get population under control as well because if you look at it in economic terms,
how can you sustain increases in per capita income at a time when you
have rising population without rising economic growth? Whereas if you have a declining
population – which is what I would
aim for – then of course even a stable economic growth situation
will give you increases in per capita income. So that’s where I
stand on that.
John Vidal
Do you … do you have a sense of what the carrying
capacity of Britain is or of the uh uh of the world as a whole?
Stanley
Johnson
Well, Britain, I’d put it at 10
or 15 million.
[John Vidal laughs – notice the Satanic
expression on his face.]
Stanley
Johnson
Um I think that’d be absolutely fine. I mean that would do us really splendidly – at
a limit 20-25. I think it’s complete nonsense that we are now
confronted with an island – would you believe it – of 70 million
people. I wrote a paper – I think it’s the only paper the Conservative party
has ever published and it was published as an Old Queen Street paper in
… in June
1972 oddly
enough: ‘Britain
needs a population policy’. [Should you be interested, dear reader, you can peruse
an article of his published online in 2015 rehashing the same tropes
here:
https://conservativehome.com/2015/09/09/stanley-johnson-why-britain-needs-a-population-policy/]
And um…
John Vidal
And you … you could still argue that today? I mean, right
now?
Stanley
Johnson
I certainly could. I certainly could. But what has
happened, of course, is that we have all been, as it were, shunted
aside ... off … shunted off course by what you might
call the rise of political
correctness. Because you can’t talk
about this now without being said you’re an
anti-feminist because you’re telling women what to do with their
bodies, or you’re
racist because you’re saying it’s the browns and the blacks
and the yellow races who mustn’t have ... um ... or you’re
left winger because you’re
religious and trying to get it, you know, the capitalist
society.
[John Vidal issues an um either in assent or out of embarrassment.]
Stanley
Johnson
So it’s a very, very difficult one now and I would say
that at the very least the governments
of the world have to start talking, the government of this
country has to talk start talking seriously about immigration. Because if you look at the rise in Britain’s population
now, you will see that, as it were, there is a really serious differential
in the fertility of the immigrant population to
the fertility of what you might call the indigenous population. So anyway … but this is … this is … this is very
political stuff, not one for Guardian readers.
SECOND EXCERPT
[The audience can be heard laughing – although it sounds
pre-recorded because the laughing ends abruptly.]
[The show’s moderator – whose name I do not know – reads
out a question. Notice the Russophobia implied in the question – the British so-called news
outlets have been spewing anti-Russian propaganda for years now; in
fact, ever since they realised that Russia’s new leadership would no
longer allow the country to be looted by international corporations.]
A gas explosion tears through
Russian bio-weapons lab containing smallpox, Ebola and HIV virus
sparking ‘major emergency’
Stanley
Johnson
That is absolutely wonderful because, as an
environmentalist, I say to myself, the
best possible news would be some mega emergency which got rid of
huge chunks of the human race.
[Huge laughter erupts and some hand clapping can even be
heard. In disgust, Tez Ilyas stands up and walks a few metres away
from Stanley Johnson.]
[The show’s moderator responds but most of her words are
drowned out by the noise coming from the audience.]
You stop it.
[In what I find to be an offensive gesture, the show’s
moderator calls Tez Ilyas back using her hand in a waving-back
movement.]
Now could Stanley
Johnson’s obsession with what
he believes is runaway human demographic expansion
have influenced the thinking of his son Boris Johnson?
To answer this question, please let me quote from an article BoJo
wrote in 2007 (initially published in The Telegraph, but reproduced on BoJo’s personal website):
It is a tragic measure of how far the world has changed – and the
infinite capacity of modern man for taking offence – that there are
no two subjects that can get you more swiftly into political trouble
than motherhood and apple pie.
[…]
As for motherhood – the fertility of
the human race – we are getting to the
point where you simply can’t discuss it, and we are thereby
refusing to say anything sensible about the biggest
single challenge facing the Earth; and no, whatever it may now be conventional to say, that
single biggest challenge is not global warming. That is a secondary
challenge. The
primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our
species itself.
[...]
How the hell can we witter on about tackling global
warming, and reducing consumption, when we are
continuing to add so relentlessly to the number of consumers? The
answer is politics, and political cowardice.
There was a time, in the 1960s and 1970s, when people such as my father,
Stanley, were becoming interested in demography, and the UN would hold giant conferences on the subject,
and it was perfectly respectable to talk about
saving the planet by reducing
the growth in the number of human beings.
But over the years, the argument changed, and certain
words became taboo, and certain concepts became forbidden, and
we have reached the stage where the very discussion of overall human
fertility – global motherhood – has become more or
less banned.
We seem to
have given up on population control, and all sorts of explanations are offered for the
surrender. Some say Indira Gandhi gave it all a bad name, by her
demented plan to sterilise Indian men with the lure of a transistor
radio.
Some attribute our complacency to the Green Revolution,
which seemed to prove Malthus wrong. It became the received wisdom
that the world’s population could rise to umpteen billions, as
mankind learnt to make several ears of corn grow where one had grown
before.
All
the evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and world poverty, by promoting literacy and female
emancipation and access to birth control. Isn’t it time politicians
stopped being so timid, and started talking about the real
number one issue?
Source:
https://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/10/25/global-population-control/
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.boris-johnson.com/2007/10/25/global-population-control/
Given that both Stanley and Boris Johnson’s have lectured
the world about their belief that the world is overpopulated,
an obvious question begs to be asked, which is: how
do both fare on that count, that is to say, what is the number of
offspring each has fathered?
For Stanley Johnson, the answer is easy as the biographical outline
posted on his website http://stanleyjohnson.org/biog/ ends as follows: Stanley has four
children by his first marriage to
the painter Charlotte Johnson-Wahl: Boris, Rachel, Leo and Joseph.
He also has two
children, Julia and Maximilian, by his
second marriage to Jennifer.
As for BoJo, he and his current wife Carrie had the
pleasure of giving birth to a second child not long before Christmas
of last year. However, there are rumours that, in addition to the
known abortion, he might have fathered an eighth
child: ‘[...] However, his exact number of
children remains in doubt as a possible
eighth child was alluded to in court documents.’ [Source: ‘Boris Johnson: How many
children does the Prime Minister have?’, https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/boris-johnson-how-many-children-carrie-symonds-b970997.html
But the
really important question with respect to BoJo, who when he was a journalist (he was London’s mayor from
2008 to 2016) blamed politicians for not having the guts to do
anything about his claim that the world is overpopulated, is
whether he has taken any action to reduce the population of Britain
to the number his father estimates is the island’s ideal ‘carrying
capacity’ since he was
placed in his current position of Britain’s Prime Minister
as a result of Theresa May’s resignation.
Dear reader, I shall let you guess where I stand on this
issue through perusal of the following headlines: