All right, our featured story is about covid vaccines now green lit for children aged 5 to 11. This is very serious; this is horrible. And I’ll read you the story, I will just cut right to the chase because we’re running out of time. [Nervous laugh] We’re running out of time. It says quote, let me burp real quick because I just drank that sparkling water. This is the latest from BBC. We’ve got another one. It says ‘Advisory boards to the Food and Drug Administration and the CDC on Tuesday decided that the benefits of jabbing children between 5 and 11 years old with the Pfizer vaccine outweigh any other health risks, the decision now awaits further approval from the full FDA and CDC. Both agencies are expected to follow the vaccine panel’s recommendation. Data from the company’s clinical trials found that a paediatric dose of the vaccine, which is 1/3 of that given to adults and adolescents, was safe and 90% effective.’ And what exactly we don’t know – as not stopping transmission or infection, or even really hospitalisation. It’s really more like mitigating symptoms if someone gets infected, which they do. ‘If health officials approve the jab, 15 million doses will go out to paediatric offices, children’s hospitals and pharmacies around the country. Following the FDA independent advisory committee's green light on Tuesday, the CDC is expected to follow suit on 2nd November, meaning jabs for five-year-olds could begin as soon as a day later.’ So it could be as soon as 3^rd November, which is like a week from now. A little bit longer, but, yeah, a little bit more than a week from today, they’ll be giving out paediatric doses of Pfizer covid vaccine to 5 to 11 year olds, already ordered 15 million doses on the way. ‘Among those between five and 11 years old, there have been about 1.8 million Covid cases confirmed in the US, according to the CDC. Fewer than two hundred have died, and most of those had underlying medical conditions.’ So you do the math on that: fewer than 200 out of 28 million children age 5 to 11. So what is that 100 out of 14 million? That’s one in 140,000 or something like that. Those are the odds. So now they’re going to give 28 million kids doses of a covid vaccine, which is dangerous, which we now know is dangerous, particularly for young people. And like I said earlier in the show, this is an exceptionally messed up situation because you could say this about anybody getting the vaccine. You could say this about adolescence, which it’s already been green lit for them. Adolescents, who we now know, according to a recent study, are at a higher risk of being hospitalised from the vaccine itself than from the virus that the vaccine is supposed to treat. And we know that adults are suffering from side effects from the vaccine too – at a lower rate than adolescents, but it’s still happening: myocarditis, pre-carditis, blood clotting, inflammation; we see that these spike proteins are crossing the blood brain barrier in some cases and causing paralysis. So it’s already a conversation for everybody else, and it’s a conversation for every other policy, the lockdowns, the masks, the plexiglass, the booster shots. It always comes back to this question, which people should be able to make for themselves – and we should at least get some transparency from public health agencies – what are the benefits? What are the consequences? What are the benefits? What are the negative side effects? And of course, that’s how these policies have to be weighed. That’s really realistically how everything has to be weighed because, you know, as we know, there are intended and unintended consequences for everything that happens and all we can do as human beings is make decisions, decisions that are better or worse, not optimal –not ideal, but better and worse. And so when you’re faced with a decision like ‘Should we shut down the entire economy indefinitely?’ You know, again, you have to ask ‘Well, what are the benefits? What are the consequences? What are the negative consequences?’ The benefits are spurious. Obviously, we saw in data that came out earlier this year that there was no difference in transmission and no difference in death rates with states that locked down versus states that didn’t. So the benefits were dubious. The negative consequences were severe and wide ranging. We’re dealing with them now: inflation and supply chain issues; unemployment chronically; double the money supply in order to stave off a total economic collapse – and you know we’re going to be dealing with that now for probably a generation. And the same goes then for booster shots, and the same goes like I said for everything else. But this one, it’s particularly bad because you look at what this is supposed to do. We’re vaccinating kids because nominally this is supposed to stop the transmission of the virus, but let’s pause for a second. The kids are not the ones at risk of getting the virus, getting hospitalised from it, dying from it or spreading it. They’re not at risk, never have been. That’s maybe the one thing that we knew from the beginning of this entire pandemic is the kids are not getting it, spreading it or dying from it. There was a lot of back and forth about surface transmission and efficacy of masks and vaccines and aerosolisation, and lots of it. But the one thing that’s been pretty indisputable from the beginning, which I don’t think they ever won back on forth on, was whether or not kids were at risk. They never have been. They’ve never been dying at high rates or suffering severe symptoms, or being hospitalised, or even getting it. But yet the FDA and CDC feel that it’s urgent that 5 to 11 year olds, every single one of them, get vaccinated – regardless of the downsides. And they say, ‘Well, there’s no notable health consequences of this. No, no adverse effects’. And you have to think even if the adverse effects are very, very rare; still, that’s greater, that’s a greater risk than the benefit that’s created from being vaccinated. If they’re not getting sick and they’re not dying from the virus, then why would we give even one kid a vaccine if the vaccine could give them irreversible damage to their cardiovascular system, which is what that is: myocarditis pre-carditis, the damaged scar tissue that’s created in the blood vessels, it’s irreversible – that stuff doesn’t heal, that sticks with you forever. And all those people having heart palpitations, all those people having the blood clotting, that doesn’t go away. That’s with you forever. And five to 11 year olds, probably like adolescents, are particularly susceptible to that. And they’re going to be damaged at a young age and deal with that for the rest of their lives. We know that at least some of them will, and we’re going to do that to those people; we’re going to do that to those children to spare, you know, whatever it is. However, many dozen more kids are going to get sick and potentially die [than] from covid. It doesn’t make any sense. And we understand that, at this point, this is beyond science; this is beyond reason. They’re doing this for some other reason – God knows what. Is it de-population? Is it profit? Or are they doing this because 28 million vaccines are purchased from the federal government, and so Pfizer makes a lot of money off of it. Is it that? Is it about something else? Is this about the credibility of the government and their public health agencies? Is it face saving? God only knows why they’re doing this, but this goes beyond science. Now, this, this mantra of everybody has to be fully vaccinated and the definition of fully vaccinated is going to evolve over time, which is what they say now. Everybody’s got to get two doses and then their booster shots and you can’t question it and you have to do it to have a job. And if you’re not, you’re killing people. This is not science anymore. As you all know, this is not empiricism. This is not rational. This is not scientific. This is now dogmatic. And some people have compared it to religion. I think that’s trite, but it’s true. This is turned into some kind of political crusade, some kind of purity test or something. It’s a demonstration of loyalty, of obedience. Or something like that, but it’s certainly not about, certainly not about public health. And again, I know this has been said before too, but it’s pretty amazing. You know, you’ve got these 5-11 year olds doing a lot of things. You know, they’re all out there drinking Gatorade every day. They’re all out there, drinking Gatorade and Pepsi and eating ****. And their water has heavy metals in it and they’re all addicted to tablets and smartphones. That I’m sure even at that young age, getting exposed to pornography and sexual content and they’re getting addicted to the scroll-on Tick Tock and Twitter and social media. And their social life will never be the same after a year of social distancing and the ongoing mask mandates and everything else. So the kids got a lot of problems. Half of them are growing up in broken homes. White kids are being taught to hate themselves. Why the problems for the young people for their mental health or physical well being? But the urgency, you know, the thing that is really being treated with urgency is that they all get MRNA gene therapy injected into them twice and then every six months. And pretty soon it’s going to be mandatory. You can bet just like everything else, you know, they start out saying ‘you can’ and then in the future they’re going to say ‘you have to’. So they’re green lighting this in the committees: they’re going to get full FDA and CDC approval for the paediatric dose of the vaccine for children by 2^nd November. And then in short order, they’re going to start saying if you want to enrol your kids in primary school, by law, you’re going to have to get them covid vaccinated, just like all the other vaccines, just like polio, just like chicken pox, you know whatever else you can have to get all your other vaccines too. Do they give you polio? I don’t even know, but you know when you’re born and then when you go to school you get, yeah, the, the battery of vaccines. They’re going to throw that in there and make it mandatory, and that’s what they seem to be cared about. They don’t care about, and I know again, I’m not the first person to say this, but yeah, nobody cares about their diet; nobody cares about what they’re exposed to in media; nobody cares about whether the technology is good for their well-being or the education or even the water in the air, but they better get injected with MRNA; better get injected with genetic material. What the hell? That’s science, that’s a health conscious society. What a joke. How do people believe this stuff? I mean that is really ridiculous. How does anybody believe this? I get it; you guys get it, but how could any normal person be like ‘Yep, public health, wear your mask, get vaccinated.’ It doesn’t make any sense. It never did. And we’ve talked about it all throughout the year. You know, I went to this pizza place a couple of weeks ago downtown. And I walk – it’s a small restaurant – I walk in – a well-known place – I walk into the host and not wearing a mask. The guy says ‘Oh your table will be right here, oh, but you have got to wear your mask. You have got to wear your mask in here.’ I go ‘OK’, put my mask on, I kid you not, walk three paces – 1,2,3 –, sit down, mask off, really. And plexiglass barriers between all the booths. So let’s see: have to wear the mask, city ordinance and we believe in; we care. So the virus doesn’t get you when you walk in the door from the door of the host and it doesn’t get you when you sit down. But it can get you when you walk from the host to the booth three paces apart, right? And same with the plexiglass: the virus is not going through, it can’t go over it, can’t go around, it’s just stopped. It’s like it just goes over and around the plexiglass barrier in the shape that it’s in. And same with the mask: it doesn’t go around the mask, it doesn’t go through the mask. People say you have got to put your mask up between bites when you’re eating on the plane or elsewhere. You have got to eat, chew. It would be one thing if people said, ‘Well, I know, it’s stupid, but we have to do it.’ But they don’t, they’re like ‘Sir, you have got to wear your mask’. What the hell is wrong with everybody? And then now with this vaccine? Everyone still getting sick in every country, in every state, in every city. But they insist ‘This is how…’ What do they think is going to happen then? Let’s have a little science here. Do they think that they’re going to eradicate covid? Because they’re not: that’s not realistic. They don’t believe that. I’m sure that the layperson, I’m sure your average vax-retard thinks that everyone has to get vaccinated so that once everyone is vaccinated then no one can get it. Yet that’s not possible. That’s not even what the health experts are going for. What the health experts are going for is something like this: ‘Mitigate the symptoms, stop the hospitalisations and the death rates with this therapeutic injection, so that the hospitals don’t come crashing down, so that everybody doesn’t die at once’. And this has always been the case. The lockdowns were never about eradicating covid, they were not about, you know, escaping covid, hiding from it, and then we return when it’s over. It’s not about… It’s always been about delaying it. It’s always been about, for whatever reason, stretching it out. Because that is not their objective: they’re not telling people ‘We’re trying to get 100% vaccination, so we can eradicate covid-like polio’. They’re not saying that because that’s impossible. That’s like eradicating the flu, that’d be like if people said, you know, ‘Everyone has to get their flu shot this year and then we’ll never get flu again’. No, that’s not possible because the flu mutates, it’s global, there’s always novel mutations of it, so we’re never getting rid of flu. The best that we could do is, you know, develop our immune system so that when the novel strain comes out, we won’t have a severe case of it. Be healthy, have a strong immune system and, yes, protect the weak. You know, the vulnerable should be washing their hands and maybe taking extra precautions, but that’s all you could do. So everybody has it in their head that we’re trying to go for 100% vaccination. They’re not even going for that. And they’re not pretending they are. But there they are lying to people about that: they keep telling people vaccination is the way out of this pandemic. Yeah, how though it’s the vaccinated which are really causing the mutations. You know, covid, when it mutates, is responding to the people that have immunity – as imperfect as the vaccinated immunity is, it only replicates spike protein, which is one part of the virus of an earlier strain, allegedly. To the extent that covid is real, it’s mutating in response to the vaccinated, and it will continue to do so. So, you know, in so far as people are travelling here, from around the world. And in so far there are other unvaccinated people in the world with covid at high numbers, we’re never getting rid of it. So what the hell are we really doing here? Get a vaccine to mitigate symptoms and you may get sick anyway in the future with bad symptoms anyway when it mutates, or something like. None of it adds up. There’s some ulterior motive. They’re not being honest, and even the people that are in favour of the vaccine, they don’t even understand what’s going on. They’re just blindly accepting this nonsense that masks and plexiglass are going to make a difference, the vaccine is going to protect you when we know none of that is true. I just don’t get it how people are not aware yet – it’s been two years almost. And people don’t trust their own eyes, don’t trust their own reason. They just, you know, believe whatever they see on TV.