Tags: Dr
Steven Gundry, cardiologist; Circulation, journal of
the American Heart Association; acute coronary syndrome; risk up
to 25% from 11%; mention of this study in a video-log by Dr
Vernon Coleman.
Steven
Gundry claims that the risk of some cardiac problem
increases from eleven per cent to twenty-five per cent after
the second mRNA injection for at least 2.5 months
Visita,
quaeso, Domine, scripta mea et
omnes insidias inimici ab eis
longe repelle.
Angeli tui sancti habitent in
eis et me in pace atque in bona
valetudine custodiant. Amen.
I had not heard about the work of the
American cardiologist Steven Gundry until I listened
to a video-log by the
English-surgeon-turned-journalist Vernon Coleman,
entitled ‘Finally!
Medical proof that the covid-19 jab is “murder”’
and dated 22nd November. In this
video-log of his [transcript here],
Dr Vernon Coleman refers to a study published by the
seventy-one-year old or so doctor Steven Gundry and
presents this study’s
main finding (see below) as evidence supporting his
own warning of the same risk a year ago.
Towards the conclusion of his article (which he reads
aloud in his video-log), Dr Vernon Coleman calls for
the following: ‘At the very least, the use
of these jabs must stop now. Immediately, until
more long-term tests are done.’ Two
simple, but highly emphatic sentences to which he adds
the following observation which is so
telling of the current state of information censorship that prevails among sources which we
had been (and still are) conditioned to consider as
trustworthy: ‘If there were any journalists left in the
mainstream media, this news would be lead item on
all TV and radio programmes and be on the front
pages of all newspapers.’
The study referred to by Dr Vernon
Coleman in his video-log was published in Circulation,
which is the journal of the American Heart
Association, on 16th November as part of
its volume 144, issue supplement 1. The title of Dr
Steven Gundry’s paper is ‘Mrna
COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial
Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the
PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning’.
As I do not know how much of an abstract one his
entitled to reproduce without violating some copyright
law, I am going to play it safe and quote only the
last three sentences of this abstract: ‘These
changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from
11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk.
At the time of this
report, these changes persist for at least 2.5
months post second dose of vac. We conclude
that the mRNA vacs dramatically
increase inflammation on the endothelium and T
cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may
account for the observations of increased
thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular
events following vaccination.’
I have provided these links to these
archived version of the article because by clicking on
‘Blogs’
of the article’s Metrics,
I noticed what could be indications suggesting that
pressure is likely to be put on the American Heart
Association for it to have the article retracted:
‘There’s
No Evidence mRNA Vaccines Cause Heart Disease, So
Why Did American Heart Association Publish It?’ Science 2.0, 01 Dec 2021 An abstract published by the American
Heart Association in its journal Circulation suggests
a correlation between mRNA vaccines…
‘Abstract
linking COVID-19 vaccines to heart trouble risk
earns expression of concern’ Retraction Watch, 30 Nov 2021 A leading heart journal has issued an
expression of concern for a meeting abstract it
published earlier this year by a cardiac…