Question from a Rebel News French-speaking Canadian reporter whose name eludes me:
My question is mostly for the scientist and the doctor. Um how science, scientists that base their narrative on science, can have their narrative as polarised as that, everywhere? So why is their narrative so publically at the opposite for the government and for other scientists?
Roger Hodkinson:
To paraphrase someone you are very familiar with, the science is settled. There’s an overwhelming consensus that nothing worked: nothing could work, nothing did work and nothing will work. That includes the vaccinations, which are not just unnecessary, experimental, untested and are actually killing people. I want to take this moment to point a finger directly at the principal cause of why we’re all here today. And it’s not the government. No, it’s us physicians who have been intimidated by our colleges, both provincially and internationally. If physicians had not been intimidated by the very body that’s supposed to protect you from me, if they’d been allowed to speak their mind without the threat of losing their income and their positions, then an individual patient, such as you and me in a closed examining room, would have been told the truth – the TRUTH. They have been denied that ability to do that. We have had that for centuries. The two principal medical ethics have been trampled on by this government. First, do no harm and informed consent. First, do no harm has been trampled on. The mandates have killed, as we’ve heard, more people, many more people than they’ve saved. But informed consent, I will put it to you: how can you give informed consent if you are not informed and you have been denied information intentionally by the colleges that are supposed to protect you? So I say this, putting a point on it: the colleges of physicians and surgeons across this country and internationally are co-conspirators with government in state-sanctioned murder. Thank you.